Book Summary: Rigged: How networks of powerful mates rip off everyday Australians

Summary: Google Gemini synopsis of Rigged: How networks of powerful mates rip off everyday Australians by Paul Frijters and Cameron K. Murray

Key Ideas: TBC..

How Australia Really Works: TBC....

Potential Solutions: TBC...


1. Rigged: How networks of powerful mates rip off everyday Australians (Paul Frijters, Cameron K. Murray)

Rigged: How networks of powerful mates rip off everyday Australians

Rigged asserts that the perception of Australia as an economically fair and opportunity-rich nation is increasingly a façade. The authors, Paul Frijters and Cameron K. Murray, argue forcefully that Australia's rising cost of living, housing crisis, and widening inequality are not merely unfortunate side effects of globalization or technological change, but the deliberate, systemic result of institutionalized cronyism. They term this mechanism the "Game of Mates"—a network of powerful, well-connected elite who utilize legal, non-explicit political favors to extract massive amounts of unearned wealth, or "rents," from the general population.

The core message is that the economic system is deliberately rigged to transfer wealth from "Sam" (the everyday Australian worker) to "James" (the powerful mates in government, business, and media). The authors estimate the cost of this rigging is staggering, suggesting that approximately 30 minutes of every hour an ordinary Australian works goes, directly or indirectly, to lining the pockets of the "Mates."


1. The Core Argument: The Game of Mates and the Mechanics of "Grey Gifts"

The book moves beyond traditional definitions of corruption (i.e., bribery and illegal kickbacks) to focus on the institutionalized, often legal, exchange of political favors.

The Dynamics of the Game: James vs. Sam

  • James (The Mates): This group comprises senior politicians, top public servants, corporate executives, lobbyists, well-placed lawyers, and compliant media figures. Their power lies in their mutual access, shared social circles, and reciprocal expectations of future favors. They use complexity and opaque policy decisions to transfer wealth.

  • Sam (The Everyday Australian): This represents the general public, workers, and taxpayers who ultimately bear the costs through inflated prices, reduced competition, higher fees, and taxes that favor the elite.

Detailed Mechanics of "Grey Gifts"

The wealth transfer is facilitated not by explicit illegal payments, but by "Grey Gifts"—reciprocal, non-cash, often non-transparent political favors that create massive wealth for the Mates while incurring costs on Sam. These include:

  • Favorable Zoning Decisions: Reclassifying agricultural or public land for residential use. This is the single largest Grey Gift. A small regulatory change immediately creates hundreds of millions or billions in profit for the developer (James).

  • Non-Competitive Tenders: Awarding lucrative government contracts, especially for infrastructure (PPPs), with guaranteed revenue streams and little risk to the private contractor.

  • Regulatory Relaxation/Oversight Failure: Allowing certain industries (e.g., banking, mining, pharmaceuticals) to operate with minimal supervision or to exploit loopholes (e.g., tax minimization schemes, environmental offsets).

  • Appointments to Lucrative Boards: Placing former politicians or friendly bureaucrats into well-paid, low-work regulatory or corporate board positions upon leaving office (the "revolving door").

  • Strategic Policy Timing: Sharing exclusive, market-moving information (e.g., upcoming tax changes, land releases) with Mates before it becomes public knowledge, allowing them to capitalize.

The key insight is that Grey Gifts are valuable precisely because they are opaque and non-monetary in the initial transaction, making them extremely difficult to prosecute or even track under current anti-corruption frameworks. The value is converted into cash after the decision is made.


2. Sector-by-Sector Rip-Offs and Rent Extraction

The book provides a systematic, sector-by-sector analysis of how the Game of Mates operates, quantifying the rents extracted from the public.

A. Real Estate/Property Development (The Biggest Game)

The land market is identified as the largest single source of extracted rent, creating Australia’s highly unaffordable housing market.

  • Zoning and Monopoly Power: State governments wield immense power through zoning laws (changing land use from rural to residential). This decision is a Grey Gift that instantly creates windfall profits (economic rent) for the landowner/developer (James).

    • Example: A property developer buys land for $\$50,000$ per hectare (rural price). A political Mate in the planning department or state cabinet changes the zoning. The land is now worth $\$5$ million per hectare (residential price). The developer did no productive work for this profit; it was purely a gift of regulation.

  • Infrastructure Charging: Developers often push for new infrastructure (roads, services) to be built with public money, or they charge exorbitant fees to the final home-buyer, passing the cost of servicing the land onto the public or the consumer while keeping the profits from the inflated land value.

  • The ACT Land Model (A Contrast): The authors cite the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) as an example where the government, as the leaseholder of most land, captures a much larger proportion of the unearned increase in land value (unimproved value). This model reduces the incentive for cronyistic zoning decisions and property speculation compared to other states.

B. Superannuation and the Financial Sector Rents

The mandatory nature of Australia's superannuation system has created a vast pool of capital, which the Mates have effectively captured through high fees.

  • Exorbitant Fees: The superannuation sector extracts billions of dollars annually through fees that are significantly higher than international benchmarks (e.g., in Denmark or the Netherlands). These excessive fees serve as a massive annual Grey Gift, transferring wealth from Sam's retirement savings to the financial elites (fund managers, administrators, executives).

  • Lack of Competition: The sector is dominated by a few large players (industry and retail funds) who are often protected by regulatory complexity and political connections, stifling genuine competition that could drive fees down.

  • The Revolving Door: The book highlights how the financial sector actively lobbies for favorable regulatory settings and often employs former politicians and regulators, ensuring a sympathetic policy environment.

C. Transportation, Infrastructure, and Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs)

Major infrastructure spending is a classic vehicle for the Game of Mates, often through poorly structured PPPs.

  • Capitalizing Gains, Socializing Losses: PPP contracts are routinely structured to guarantee profits for the private partners (James), regardless of actual usage or efficiency. If a toll road fails to meet traffic projections, the taxpayer (Sam) is often obligated to compensate the company, effectively socializing the risk while privatizing guaranteed returns.

  • Favorable Contract Clauses: The bidding and contracting process is often opaque, leading to contracts filled with clauses that shield the private partner from financial risk and inflate their revenue streams.

  • Project Selection: Decisions on which projects proceed are often politically motivated (i.e., driven by the need to reward Mates) rather than based on rigorous cost-benefit analysis, leading to "white elephant" projects that drain public funds.

D. Universities and the Managerial Class

The authors argue that Australia’s university sector has been hijacked by a managerial class appointed by political Mates to university councils, diverting its focus from education and research to commercial pursuits.

  • Salary and Status Inflation: University Vice-Chancellors and senior executives now command massive, corporate-level salaries, which have been approved by politically appointed councils. This is a direct extraction of rent.

  • The Visa-Selling Game: Universities are incentivized to massively increase international student numbers, not solely for education, but because it is tied to an immigration pathway (a Grey Gift of visa access), allowing universities to charge exorbitant fees. The profit from this high-volume, often lower-quality, student market transfers wealth to the administrative class and is spent on vanity projects and high salaries.

  • Public Land Development: Universities are often granted valuable public land, which they then use for commercial property development (e.g., student accommodation, commercial buildings) in partnership with private developers (Mates), extracting further rent from a public asset.


3. The Enablers: Myths, Media, and Institutional Complicity

The Game is sustained by systemic forces that suppress accountability and maintain the Mates' control over the narrative.

  • Ideological Myths: The Game of Mates relies on the constant promotion of economic narratives (e.g., "trickle-down economics," "global competition necessitates deregulation," "we must attract foreign capital") that serve to distract the public from the true source of wealth extraction: domestic cronyism.

  • Media Capture: The book highlights the concentrated ownership of media in Australia and the self-censorship that occurs because media owners are often part of the elite network (James). This ensures that critical investigative reporting on rent-seeking activities, particularly concerning major advertisers and political figures, is frequently suppressed or reframed. Stories often originate from corporate/government press releases, controlling the narrative.

  • Bureaucratic Complicity: The public service is incentivized to facilitate the Game, as doing so leads to better career prospects, lucrative post-public-service jobs (the revolving door), and higher salaries, effectively making the bureaucracy a compliant partner in the wealth transfer.


4. Proposed Solutions: Reducing Rents and Increasing Accountability

The authors conclude that existing anti-corruption measures focused on transparency and complexity are inherently flawed, as complexity is the Mates' greatest weapon. Their strategy is radical: Remove the valuable "Grey Gifts" and rents from the control of the Mates.

Key Policy Prescriptions: Targeting the Rent

  • Clawing Back Land Rents (The Single Most Important Reform):

    • Reform Zoning: Implement a system (similar to the ACT model) where the state retains the full benefit of increases in land value created purely by planning changes. When land is rezoned, the government should tax or charge the owner for 100% of the difference between the prior and current market value, removing the incentive for developers to lobby for Grey Gifts.

  • Democratizing Power via Citizen Juries:

    • For high-stakes decisions (e.g., major infrastructure project approvals, appointments to key regulatory bodies, setting of university executive salaries), replace political appointments with randomly selected Citizen Juries or reference groups. This introduces a genuine separation between the decision-makers and the interested parties (James).

  • Dismantling Financial Sector Rents:

    • National Default Super Fund: Create a default national, low-fee superannuation fund (similar to some international models) that provides a benchmark to drive down the exorbitant fees currently extracted by private funds.

    • Simplify Regulation: Replace complex financial regulation with simple, enforceable rules (e.g., a cap on fees), making it harder for financial elites to exploit loopholes.

  • Reforming Universities and Public Assets:

    • Market Value Land Leases: Require universities to pay the market value for any public land they intend to use for commercial property development, stripping the "Grey Gift" out of the property game.

    • Limit Executive Pay: Cap the salaries of university executives at a reasonable multiple of the average academic's salary.

In summation, Rigged is an essential, hard-hitting analysis that argues Australia is suffering from an economic system that functions not on free-market principles, but on a vast, intricate network of self-serving elite connections. It provides a detailed blueprint of how wealth is extracted and offers equally radical, structural solutions aimed at drying up the sources of unearned rent that feed the Game of Mates.


2. How Australia Really Works Commentary



Popular posts from this blog

How much of my DIY superannuation cash returns are being extracted by super funds?

Book Summary: The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good?