Book Summary - Leviathan and Its Enemies (Samuel T. Francis)

Summary: "Francis’s magnum opus is a a massive, systematic work of political sociology that updates James Burnham’s 1941 thesis, The Managerial Revolution. It analyses the transition from a bourgeois to managerial society, and the "xenophobic nationalism" that Francis saw as the inevitable counter-reaction."


1. Leviathan and Its Enemies (Samuel T. Francis)

[Google Gemini Summary]

I. The Conceptual Foundation: The Managerial Revolution

Francis begins with the premise that the 20th century was not a struggle between "democracy" and "totalitarianism," but rather a global revolution in which a new ruling class—the managerial elite—displaced the old bourgeois elite.

  • The Old Elite (Bourgeois): Power was rooted in private property, individual capital, local community, and a limited state. This class valued thrift, autonomy, and traditional moral codes that restricted the reach of government.

  • The New Elite (Managerial): Power is rooted in technical expertise, administrative skills, and the control of mass organizations (large corporations, government bureaucracies, mass media, and international foundations).

  • The Engine of Change: The "revolution" was driven by the sheer scale of modern life. As the economy, population, and technology grew too complex for individual owners to manage, they were replaced by a class of professional specialists—managers, technocrats, and bureaucrats—who "know how to make the machine run."

II. The Fusion of Mass Organizations (The "Leviathan")

Francis argues that in the managerial age, the traditional distinctions between "public" and "private" sectors vanish. They fuse into a single "Managerial Leviathan."

  1. The State: Becomes a "Mega-state" that no longer simply protects rights but manages social outcomes through engineering and therapeutic intervention.

  2. The Economy: Shifts from free-market capitalism to "Managerial Capitalism." Large corporations behave like government bureaus, prioritizing growth, stability, and HR-driven social conformity over raw, short-term profit for shareholders.

  3. The Culture: The "Knowledge Industry" (universities, media, think tanks) provides the Managerial Ideology. This ideology — modern liberalism — justifies the elite's power by claiming that all social problems are technical issues requiring expert intervention.

III. The Managerial Ideology: Cosmopolitanism and Progress

The ideology of the Leviathan is inherently hostile to the "bourgeois" world. Francis identifies several key pillars:

  • Universalism/Globalism: The manager prefers a borderless world because borders are "inefficiencies." International trade and global governance expand the manager's field of operation.

  • Social Engineering: The belief that human nature is plastic and can be "improved" or "managed" by experts.

  • Hostility to Tradition: Traditional loyalties (family, religion, nation) are viewed as "obstacles to progress" and "pathologies" because they create autonomous centers of power that the manager cannot control.

IV. "Soft" vs. "Hard" Managerialism

A unique contribution of Francis is his distinction between two forms of managerial rule:

  • Soft Managerialism (The West): Exercises power through "therapeutic" means—social pressure, education, media messaging, and economic incentives. It avoids the "frank use of force," preferring to pathologize dissent as "ignorance" or "hate."

  • Hard Managerialism (USSR/Nazi Germany): Used direct state violence and coercion. Francis argues that while "Soft" managerialism is more stable, both share the same goal: the total administration of society by a technical elite.

V. The "Enemies": Middle American Radicals (MARs)

The "Enemies" of the title are not the old capitalists (who are gone) or the "proletariat" (who have been absorbed). The real threat to the Leviathan is the Middle American Radicals (MARs).

  • Who they are: The traditional middle class, small business owners, and culturally conservative workers who live in the "heartland."

  • Why they are angry: They feel "squeezed" from above by a cosmopolitan elite that hates their values and taxes their income, and from below by a dependent underclass that they believe the elite uses as a political "bludgeon" against them.

  • The Psychological State: They experience a sense of "dispossession"—the feeling that the country they once owned has been stolen by a group of alien, credentialed experts.

VI. The Path to Xenophobic Nationalism

This is where Francis explains how the managerial system creates its own nationalist "Gravedigger":

  1. Identity as Resistance: Because the Managerial Elite uses "Universalism" and "Diversity" to dismantle local power, the resistance must use Particularism (Nationalism, Localism, or Racial Identity) to defend itself.

  2. Xenophobia as a Protective Shield: Francis theorized that the MARs would eventually realize that "conservative" arguments about the Constitution or Free Markets were useless against a managerial state that had already captured those institutions.

  3. The Nationalist Turn: To survive, the "squeezed" middle class adopts a "Nationalist-Socialist" program (in the sociological sense). They demand a state that protects their jobs (Protectionism) and their culture (Xenophobia/Nationalism).

  4. The Caesarist Leader: Francis predicted that this movement would not be led by intellectuals, but by a "Caesar"—a charismatic leader who could bypass the managerial bureaucracy and speak directly to the mass loyalties of the dispossessed.

VII. Anarcho-Tyranny

Francis famously coined the term "Anarcho-Tyranny" in this context. It describes a stage of the Managerial State where:

  • The state fails to perform basic duties (anarchy), such as controlling borders or stopping street crime.

  • The state simultaneously cracks down on law-abiding citizens (tyranny) through regulation, "hate speech" laws, and administrative harassment.

  • Result: This pushes the populace toward a "radical" nationalism that prioritizes "Order" over "Liberty."

VIII. Conclusion: The Crisis of the Leviathan

Francis concludes that the Managerial State is not necessarily the "end of history." Its Achilles' heel is its inability to provide meaning. By reducing human life to a series of technical problems and economic transactions, it creates a spiritual and cultural vacuum.

The "Enemies" of the Leviathan — the nationalist-populist forces — emerge when the elite’s "social engineering" fails to produce the promised utopia, leading to a "telluric revolt" (a revolt of the earth/soil) against the "cosmopolitan" clouds.

Key Takeaways for Today’s Reader

  • The "Deep State" is Managerialism: What modern populists call the "Deep State" is exactly what Francis described as the permanent administrative class.

  • Woke Capital: The book explains why corporations support radical social causes; they are not "caving" to the left, but are expressing the inherent "managerial" drive to dismantle traditional social structures.

  • Prescience: Written largely in the 1990s, the book is often cited today as a "prophetic" roadmap for the rise of Trumpism, Brexit, and European National-Populism.

Popular posts from this blog

Book Summary - The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy (Mariana Mazzucato)

Image
Summary : "A critique of modern capitalist economies, arguing that the confusion between value creation (making) and value extraction (taking) is the root cause of today's widening inequality, financial instability, and slow innovation. Mazzucato contends that over the last few decades, the way economists define, measure, and reward value has fundamentally changed, allowing rent-seeking activities to masquerade as wealth creation. This shift has led to massive rewards for those who merely extract wealth from the system, while the true collective creators of value—including the state, workers, and long-term investors—are increasingly undervalued and under-compensated." The book proposes that if we are to successfully reform capitalism and steer the global economy toward sustainable, inclusive, and innovation-led growth, we must first reignite the long-dormant debate about what economic value truly is, and who, precisely, creates it. Key Ideas : Value creation vs extraction...
Read more

Article Commentary: There is no evidence NDIS therapies help kids thrive

Image
Summary : The purpose of this article is not debating evidence for NDIS-funded therapies, it's about ever-increasing government spending that is wasteful, low-value and exposed to fraud:  "It is no coincidence that Australia’s sluggish productivity, real wages and living standards coincided with massive amounts of taxpayer money being pumped into the now $52 billion National Disability Insurance Scheme and other social welfare programs over the past decade."
Read more

How much of my DIY superannuation cash returns are being extracted by super funds?

Image
Problem : Australians managing their own super may lose ~1-3% of their interest on cash in their superannuation transaction accounts compared to the minimum super funds are making on it (benchmarked by the RBA Cash Rate). Interest rates well under 1% are not uncommon for SMSF or DIY Super. By eliminating the value of risk-free cash returns, the finance industry forces people into fee-extracting and unnecessarily high-risk or fraud-exposed investments. Key Ideas : Wealth Extraction; Financial Repression; Negative Real Rates (aka Stealth Tax). Rationale : Australians employees are forced to have 12% of their wages paid into super. If saving in at-call cash outside of super they could get returns ~0.5-1% higher than the RBA Cash Rate. E.g. Macquarie offers 4.25% with the RBA rate at 3.6%. Solution : Force federal politicians to require all super funds to pay a minimum interest rate on cash benchmarked to the RBA Cash Rate (or relevant proxy like BBSW). See prior reforms  here . Rew...
Read more